padib said:
@ZyroXZ2. Campy writing is nust for flavor, and fun, the goal was to get people to show how all 3 have value and inspire strengths in each other. Post a link to your video, I am interested to watch it, there is no shame in sharing. There is also no shame in talking about the companies and how they manage themselves and how we think they should be mamaged, especially on a sales site it's nice to train our entrepreneurial muscles. There are worse things we could do with our time. ;)
While you post your link, here is a first take for me:
Sony came in the industry strongly, assuming they could take the market from Nintendo. While they came close, Nintendo had to fight hard to survive and this pushed them to find new ways to excite gamers and offer revolutionary game experiences. But Nintendo also learned from the production budgets of their competitors and learned to build games of very high production value, with orchestrated music and more compelling and believable worlds, culminating in games on the Switch like breath of the wild and Mario Odyssey.
I will post more as time goes by and more people join into the conversation - or not, I will post anyway. The above take from me is Nintendo learning high production from Sony and Microsoft, next time I will probably talk about how Sony's offerings were influenced by Microsoft. |
The video is super old AND I basically summed it up in my reply (there are differences, but not enough to worry about). It may seem like I'm just a spammer, but in reality, I post my videos as my way of actually placing my thoughts on the table because the videos and me are really the same thing lol
