By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Leynos said:
DonFerrari said:

Sorry but this list would be destroyed alone with either any numbered FF or Persona. You may prefer these titles, but to say that PS is losing more big IPs than Nintendo from Japanese devs is just wrong.

Never said Sony would lose them. Saying it's only hardware restrictions keeping those games off Switch the best selling system in Japan.

Sony has not been kind to Japanese devs last few years but Nintendo https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/q631od/cyberconnect2_ceo_published_a_letter_thanking/

I do know why the titles are skipping Nintendo, and at least some of the titles you listed that didn`t show up on Sony isn`t because devs don`t like Sony, unless you think SE doesn't like Sony so they didn't put Octopath on it, or perhaps Xbox is selling so well that it is on it.

There are plenty of letters, you may go after the ones devs in Japan were thanking PS4 for relinking their fire to put quality SW on console. And sure I don't have any doubt Switch is the best seller dedicated gaming device in Japan. And again the titles that are skipping Switch benefits from the WW success of PS, if they thought cutting back to be able to release on Switch would bring more profits they would have done it.

Still you were the one disputing with the other user that PS consoles are losing more japanese content than Nintendo. When again in fact, when looking at the biggest IPs/Publishers it is the opposite.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."