By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
hinch said:

Quite interesting results. Tbh since these consoles are aiming at high resolutions with low/mid range GPU's.. A CPU that performs around a 2700X is good enough to not be a bottleneck. Like most games are pushing for higher resolutions like 1440P and above with low framerate caps. I.e. 30 FPS with highest settings and 60FPS for performance. At which point these consoles are mostly GPU bound.

Kinda wished both made GPU's larger but that would have increased cost so it is what it is. A Nvidia GPU would have been great but it would have added extra complexity in design, materials and cost. But yeah Nvidia already burned the bridges with Sony and MS before on earlier consoles, so another colab is very unlikely to ever happen again which is unfortunate xP

Yeah, I don't think they'll forget that anytime soon, specially since AMD also gives them a cheap/capable x86 processor along the way. Nvidia only has Nintendo which, given their current approach to gaming consoles, will be a great platform to show off their DLSS tech withthe Switch 2... if they can convince Nintendo to use a modern SoC with a capable GPU.

Although Nvidia will have to design one that's more focused on gaming than computing first.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.