Dulfite said:
Really? You don't think MS, a company that is constantly entering markets it hasn't been in, isn't looking into VR? If Sony is making profit off of it then Microsoft absolutely would make profit off of it and will no doubt get into it. What better way to enter it than having proven developers that have made VR games? I stand by that this was a preventative move. |
MS have said they would invest on AR for X1 ever since before releasing X1X, but so far nothing.
Pemalite said:
A purchase, any purchase... Is inorganic growth. |
I partially disagree because well the IPs already belonged to Sony, so it wouldn't be that much different than hiring everyone directly and giving a name to the studio versus buying the studio as whole, they would even save in some redundancies =p just would give a little more work to do.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."