Well, no. I don't care about availability right now, but when I do eventually want to get one I certainly don't want to have to pay more for it. I certainly don't enjoy the prospect of having to pay more for a system, just because current demand stupidly outweighs how I believe they should be valued.
That said, there's already enough people desparate enough to pay extra through re-sellers. So if the market wants to keep operating in this way, and consumers want to keep moaning about availability of these systems like it's akin to putting food on their table, then I wouldn't blame the companies for making this kind of move.
If you're going to complain about how expensive gaming is, yet your concern is over systems not even a year old that are already expensive-- and as stated, luxury items --meanwhile there's more than enough suitable alternatives, then forgive me but you're not a victim in my eyes. So I don't blame the OP or others for raising the question/topic.
