MikeB said:
@ selnor
I am impressed, that article is so horribly flawed in almost any sense and you know it else Halo 3 would have kicked the arse of what Killzone 2 will be.
It's clearly written by someone who knows nothing about neither system. Why quote it? It's just a compilation of fanboy misconceptions.
|
I love when people use Halo 3. Halo 3 was designed that way from an art point of view. Bungie said they did not want to go for a realistic look and break up the Halo trilogy effect. In terms of on screen enemies and such Halo 3 has far more than ive seen on KZ2 so far. And the way games are made still point to general purpose processing. Crysis is a tale of that. That article wasnt from some editor of a review site. It was from M$ after Sony claimed the PS3 a god machine. See M$ have worked in the PC market for a long time. They have worked with hundreds of CPU's to get the best from their software and I'm sure they know what they are talking about. DX10 is set up to use general purpose processing. Sony have had far less involvement with CPU tech than M$. Keep in mind that Sony has a track record of over promising and under delivering on technical performance.
