By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bofferbrauer2 said:
Captain_Yuri said:

I'd be surprised if AMD disables it in Zen 4 as that would be a pretty easy selling point even if many consumers may not get much use out of it.

AVX-512 is certainly irrelevant today, but who knows in a couple years?

For Instance, Phenom-based processors couldn't start some games after 2015 anymore since those needed SSE 4.1 and/or 4.2, but those only had the AMD-exclusive 4.a. But in 2009, SSE4 was still even just barely used in HPC.

Either way, it would be funny if in a couple years some game would make use of AVX-512 and then run on Rocket lake, but not it's immediate successors...

Captain_Yuri said:

Intel Core i9-12900K 16 Core Alder Lake CPU Benchmarked on ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E Gaming WIFI Motherboard, Faster Than Core i9-11900K

https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-12900k-16-core-desktop-cpu-benchmarked-asus-rog-strix-z690-e-gaming-wifi-motherboard-faster-than-amd-ryzen-9-5950x/

Now these are early samples but man, if this is true, Alder Lake S is gonna be a flop. The benchmark is clearly not taking advantage of the 5950x's 16 cores 32 threads because of how close it is to an 11900k. So the fact that the i9-12900k is this close means that it's in big trouble! We will see what happens when the CPU actually comes out but if this is what Intel's answer to AMD is... This ain't it chief!

We clearly need some more test samples to see the full picture, but since Alder Lake is supposed to be released in October, I doubt it will change much over what we have right now in the leaks.

So for the high end, I expect Intel to revive it's HEDT platform with Sapphire Rapids and fight both the 5950X and the Threadrippers 5960X and 5970X with that one while Alder Lake will compete with the 5900X at best.

And that's all without the boost AMD is about to give their CPUs with the infinity cache they'll be getting for their refresh...

Captain_Yuri said:

Intel DG2-512 specs compared to nVidia GA104 and AMD Navi 22 (as well DG2-128 & DG2-256)

https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/p95nyq/intel_dg2512_specs_compared_to_nvidia_ga104_and/

Now I wouldn't compare TF between the GPUs as they are meaningless. But it does give us an interesting idea as to the spec differences. I do think that RDNA 2 is lacking in ML performance but we already knew that with DF. The Ray Tracing performance is something I will be interested in seeing.

Interesting would have been to know the TGP or TBP of Arc to see if it can keep up in that regard or run very hot.

Another funny thing is that if Zen 4 does have AVX512, all those benches that Intel was ahead in due to AVX512 support will then be reversed.

I am personally not feeling Alder Lake S anymore as there were early leaks of Rocket Lake before it launched and the performance wasn't much different post launch. Alder Lake could be a really hot mess when it comes out, maybe even worse than Zen 1. New Memory, New PCI-E, big.LITTLE scheduling and etc. I am sure there's going to be tons of Windows and BIOS updates gonna be needed to make it all viable. Meanwhile Zen 3 gets heavily discounted and Zen 3 Vcache comes out with tried and true formula with DDR4 and gen 4 while giving people more performance. And by the time AMD comes out with their own big.LITTLE, all these issues will be fixed. If Alder Lake isn't 15-20% faster than Zen 3 with their big cores, Intel is gonna be in big big trouble.

Also they do have TDP estimates in the bottom table but I'd take it with some salt.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850