hinch said:
4.25Ghz is a bit low. Though this is non-k SKU so this would be their more budget line. Whats interesting is the totally different core configurations which we haven't seen yet segregating the K and non K models. It should at the very least be faster than the 11600 and the K model a modest bump over that - if we go by the early leaked benchmarks on engineering samples. And wow at that slip up on that FE card. 'Finger clot' eh? O_o I would be mortified if I opened up my GPU and found that. |
Yea that's true, I suppose this is supposed to be their entry level i5. I am assuming the replacement for 11400. Still, scoring 20-30% lower than 11600k with big cores feels a bit odd even at a lower clock but granted this is userbenchmark as well. But yea, the core config situation is very interesting. I am very interested on how it all prices out.
And yea, it's a odd thing for sure lol. I'd frame it and tell my grandkids about this.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850







