Currently Online 
Yea pretty much. I harped on the 3060 a lot because it's just a 2060 Super with 12GB of Vram yet a 6600XT makes a 3060 seem like a great value. And while 3060 for $329 isn't bad per say as a 2060 Super had an MSRP of $399. You looked at the 3060 Ti, it gave 2080 Super levels of performance for just "$70 more."
The 6600 XT on the other hand... Has really no place other than AMD taking advantage of the market and being greedy. It's up to 15% faster in some Raster games than a 3060 for 15% increase in price but it offers none of the benefits that you get with a 3060. A 3060 can keep up with the consoles in some Ray Tracing heavy games and gives you 12GB of Vram. A 6600XT will get killed. And of course, it's so close to a 3060 Ti in price and the Ti will demolish it in everything.
If anyone needed proof that an AMD monopoly would be just as bad as Intel/Nvidia monopoly if not worse... Well the signs are right here!
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850
