Chazore said:
Because those two guns are on a totally different platform and have their own targets to meet specifically?. Consoles for the longest time have been fine with aiming for 30fps 4k, only recently trying to aim for 60-120fps and 4k. With PC we're looking for bigger boons to fps, and res bumps are just there for us to choose from, but the perf boost is what we're mostly after, so naturally I'd want AMD to perfect it on that platform first, before we all think of mass adopting it. Like I said, the last thing we need as a whole is adopting something that isn't up to par with what another party is offering. If AMD's offering is lesser than DLSS and everyone mass adopts it, then Nvidia is likely going to either drop it like they dropped hairworks and partly g-sync or having to pay more out of the pocket to get sponsor deals to then get DLSS into selected games (instead of all of them, and not every game I know features both AMD and Nvidia tech together, let alone playing super nicely with each other on their respective cards). From my pov AMD has got to bring the A+ game, or it should go home, because I don't want to see people accepting less and thinking that's dandy when someone is clearly offering better. |
How exactly do you supose they get better if they come out lacking? It takes developement not just from hardware manufactures but also from software devs. And that's why consoles will be amds best allies in this war. Because consoles have set hardware and need to improve their software as time goes on as much as possible to keep up. Just look at sonys latest years their games are always outdoing themselves and getting better and better and always getting game of the year. This is the kind of push that consoles make. Cuz lets be honest. If amds fsr comes out crappy, pc gamets are already majority nvidea and they wont even give the time of day to amd. It would end up dead before they can improve it.
It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.
