By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:

I mean, AMD are likely to use it on PC first, instead of weirdly going consoles only first, only for 1st party exclusives to then somehow push it on PC against Nvidia.

That last vote point makes no sense when you have to consider that AMD makes the tech available on PC, usually first if anything.

What we have to do is wait and see how this performs across the board (PC and consoles) once it's out and pitted against DLSS to see if it's any good. Last thing we need is a piece of tech being adopted that's worse off than what a competitor is providing that's good/decent.

I never said it was going to consoles first. I said it's first going to pc. I said it wont be long at all untill it goes to consoles. And the last vote point was not meant to mean its coming to consoles first. I meant it wont come to pc this year but neither to consoles.

We dont have to wait at all. Just like rtx nvidea has a 2 year head start on this tech. Nvedia will be ahead and all insiders already say as much. Its gona land somewhere between dlss v1 and v2. Amd needs the consoles to push fsr for them. Thats a guaranty username of over 100m while nvedia already has a full gen of cards put there and the latest is probably selling more than amd. 

And I also dont mean exclusives only will use fsr. I said they will be the first to push it cuz MS and sony have been working closely with amd so their internal studios would have more acces to this tech as this progressed while third partys probably got it once it was complete. 



It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.