Captain_Yuri said:
I actually posted the original tweet before wccftech made an article about it a bit ago and I added what red tech gaming said about the IO die and 160 CUs from the tweet thread. Although personally I don't believe in what Red Tech gaming says as he was the one that also stated that RT performance of RDNA 2 will be pretty close to Ampere but we all know how that turned out. But it certainly wouldn't surprise me if it's 3x if the rumors are true. |
I don't know how reliable at RedtechGaming are, but we're using Videocardz and WccfTech so...
Anyway, the parts that caught my interest are the ones where they state that it will be thre times more powerful (we'll see if it's true or not but with twice the CUs and shaders it should be close to that), that the RT performance will be around Ampere levels (so Nvidia's next gen should beat AMD again), and that it won't have dedicated cores to handle their Super Resolution tech.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.