curl-6 said:
mjk45 said:
I assume based off your post (you would know better than me anyway) that the gap between poll numbers and supporting posts is wider than usual, if so I would put it down to the disparity of both consoles across a number of fronts making it harder to make a more concise argument for Vita than just using generalities like I prefer it because of more jrpgs it's portability suits me etc. Where with say the PS1 vs Xbox you have a lot more scope in regards to finding equivalent or near equivalent points to use to push your side or counter/offset available giving both sides a clearer path for debate, and driving engagement something that the more disparare natures of Vita vs Xbox makes much harder to do. |
I did a PS1 vs Xbox poll some time ago, in the form of "each company's best first console". |
While I do rate this particular poll's subject choice near the bottom,my reply wasn't about whether or not xbox v PS1 should have been this Poll, it was just an example to highlight the points made before it about how disparity in the subjects being polled can affect one's ability to mount an effective case and so may well be the answer to the question posed by your post about engagement being less than the affirmative Vita poll numbers would indicate.
