Chazore said:
Fair doos. I'll have to wait and see what they do, but I am being affected by the update with some games that use both full screen and exclusive FS (performance drops and stuttering). I'm not really liking how we just got out of that shitty Nvidia driver situation (perf drops for games like Supreme comm) and MS lands us into another one via their updates. Can people please thoroughly test updates before releasing them? (hate how it takes months for them to fix what they otherwise roll out in seconds). I still remember when Lisa said they were going to put a bit more focus on their GPU side, after Ryzen clapped Intel's ass for the past few years, but then we get a paper launch and not much else. I know ppl rip on Jensen for his empty words, but Lisa's honestly going the same route with their GPU llineup (like if she doesn't care, she should at least be honest, and I know no company wants to be, out of fear of losing sales, but that's how it be when you're failing and lie about who you're really wanting to support at the end of the day). I guess at this point I should just wait for the 4000 series, because 3000 is really sounding like some weird dream to me. Duct tape RT lmao, so true though, and it'll only get worse the more Nvidia rolls out with. If they focus more on consoles, play a very slow game of catch up on PC, then we're going to end up seeing quite a large divide, where AMD goes to being far more console based, and nvidia PC based with some partial console side share (Switch/switch2). Not a good look for AMD if you'd ask me. |
Yea, it's what happens when a company like MS fires majority of their Windows quality control testing team and instead started crowd sourcing quality control with Windows updates. There's a pretty good reason why Windows 10 has had a reputation of being buggy compared to their older versions of Windows.
Yea, both Nvidia and AMD are shitty companies when you get right down to it. Most people just like AMD better cause of the underdog status and gloss over the fact that AMD is selling a product that is great in raster but fairly terrible in other things for about the same price as Nvidia who is giving you all these features on top of being great at raster. But don't worry, if you some how managed to buy a 6800XT for your dual core CPU system and you like to play at low settings and 720p resolution, AMD is the much better choice because of the low cpu overhead.
To AMD's credit though, they did catch up in Raster which after quite a few generations of losing, is quite a big leap. It's hard to recommend RDNA 2 because of their issues but it's hard to deny their advancements. The question is whether or not they are gonna go the GCN route or the Ryzen route. When they released the 7000 and then the 200 series, AMD was going toe to toe with Nvidia as well. But eventually, Nvidia started to take a massive lead for years. Right now, it feels like RDNA 2 could be the 7000 series. But as the number of games that support Ray Tracing and DLSS increase, AMD needs to make sure their RT performance is competitive with Nvidia and Super Resolution is actually good on top of having excellent Raster. If they can do that while keeping a competitive price, even I might go a full Red Team build one day.
Just the question is, will they be able to?
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850







