Doctor_MG said:
Bold 1: I don't understand your distinction. I said it's my point of view as a consumer. I'm a consumer. Stating I'm just one consumer is obvious. Clearly I'm not twenty. I also said that they've been successful, so you're kind of repeating information here. Bold 2: Jak and Daxter sold as well as the Ratchet and Clank franchise at the time, and the latter ended up being a very successful franchise overall that is still getting new entries. Bold 3: This, again, is repetitive information. Of course I'm speaking from the point of view of myself. I don't see what you are looking for here. The following information is how much I love those IP's and how I am disappointed that the team behind those IP's is being reconfigured or outright disbanded. Overall, it seems we are arguing two separate points. You're arguing the benefits as a business, which I'm not arguing. I'm just saying that, if this news is true, I don't think the Playstation platform is going to be for me anymore. I'll stick with my PC and Switch instead. |
1 - Not saying you are twisting. Just saying that sure your opinion as customer have validity, but still in this case is a minority of customer. So when you say you are looking at the POV of customer, I wanted to highlight that.
2 - Don`t know if you know, but as far as we know and have many devs saying this they are the ones that chose what they want to develop. So Insomniac kept releasing their biggest IP (Ratchet and Clank) while ND decided to not do it (and had done before with Crash, but for other reasons as well), that is the reason why one survived and the other didn`t, but being frank neither have much lasting power outside of the fans of them (which weren`t many until the last R&C game even though I really like them and even my wife likes).
Overall, I`m not arguing the benefits as a business but also for most customers and of course you`ll never have 100% people satisfied and in this case you were left behind, that is sad and yep perhaps Playstation won`t be for you anymore.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







