Bofferbrauer2 said:
I would say Skylake is as a whole Intel's Bulldozer. I mean, AMD also spent years on the exact same platform (outside of the APUs) with little evolution. What Rocket Lake is is not their Bulldozer, but their Centurion. Speaking of which, nobody got one lying around at home? I would love to see some comparisons of thermals and power draw between the RL i9 and the Centurion. |
I don't think I'd go that far. The problem with Bulldozer wasn't that it had little evolution. The problem with Bulldozer is that it had the wrong type of evolution. Those cores were so potato that in certain cases, even the Phenom II CPUs from the previous gen could beat Bulldozer in certain tasks and games while Intel was on another league. Not to mention the power that Bulldozer needed. Skylake was little evolution sure but it didn't do anything wrong to that extent and it held it's own in gaming and various work loads against Ryzen in the consumer space.
The thing that makes Rocket Lake Intel's Bulldozer moment is that it is the wrong type of evolution. Going from 10 cores to 8 cores is pretty wtf worthy and the power that the Rocket Lake is able to produce is nuts. We will see how Alder Lake turns out though.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850







