By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Some more news since it's news day

AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) to launch this year for PCs

https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-fidelityfx-super-resolution-fsr-to-launch-this-year-for-pcs

"He confirmed that the company still has a lot of work to do and it is still evaluating the actual technology behind the upscaling algorithm."
"It is not FFS, nor it is FXSS, the actually officially acronym for NVIDIA DLSS competitor is FSR, Scott Herkelman confirmed during the interview:"
"You don’t need machine learning to do it, you can do this many different ways and we are evaluating many different ways. What matters the most to us is what game developers want to use because if at the end of the day it is just for us, we force people to do it, it is not a good outcome. We would rather say: gaming community, which one of these techniques would you rather see us implement so that this way it can be immediately spread across the industry and hopefully cross-platform."

This is certainly gonna take a while to come out by the sounds of it.


Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger announces “Intel Unleashedâ€Â webcast on March 23rd

https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-ceo-pat-gelsinger-announces-intel-unleashed-webcast-on-march-23rd

I swear they are making it sound like Nvidia is holding devs at gunpoint, just to make use of DLSS and other features, at least going by the "f at the end of the day it is just for us, we force people to do it, it is not a good outcome" part.

Sounds like it'd going to take forever, and by the time it even comes out, Nvidia's going to be another step or two ahead, making their offering seem dull...again.

I think they need to spend far less time talking about spreading this and not forcing that (also less jabs), and spending more time just working on this tech that was supposed to be out around the time DLSS was. I just hate AMD talking shit and coming late to any party, and claiming next time it'll be better. Like they brought their A-game with their CPU's, just bring it with the GPU's. 

Yea it is gonna be a hard time for RDNA 2 overall until RDNA 3 comes out. Well on paper anyway since they are able to sell as many as they can make loll.

I think it's just a situation where Nvidia saw what was coming next for the GPU industry which was Ray Tracing and built their GPUs around it from the ground up. AMD on the other hand was playing catch up with Raster and because of that, they are now in a position where they are behind in next generation tech.

I think RDNA 2 is more of a stepping stone for AMD. More so than anything, they needed to catch up in Raster against Nvidia in all fronts and for the most part, they did. And luckily for them, being behind in Ray Tracing and not having DLSS isn't affecting them very much thanks to a number of games still being Raster heavy and the stock issues.

The biggest question is going to be whether or not AMD can have all these technologies ready in time for RDNA 3 and take on Nvidia's Lovelace. Cause as the list of games that implement Ray Tracing and DLSS grows, it will get harder to recommend AMD GPUs. And you just know that Nvidia is gonna have something big cooking in Jensen's oven after seeing RDNA 2. But say what you will about AMD, I had my doubts they could even take on 3080 in Raster yet here we are.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850