| Bofferbrauer2 said: It's either that or AMD wants to absolutely avoid similar pitfalls like those that DLSS had early on, where it made the picture quality worse than just manually adjusting the resolution to get the same framerate. |
Probably a factor they're considering to avoid. I know they should also be able to see what nvidia did wrong and then corrected at the time, so they shouldn't really be repeating the same mistakes with their offering when the time comes.
| JEMC said:
And how the f*ck was this supposed to come out with DLSS if they announed it during the reveal of their RDNA 2 cards back in October? |
I meant in them always lagging behind. I knew it wouldn't make it on time and then there's the reveal of the RDNA 2 cards last Oct, I just wanted to say that they lag behind and that they should kinda stop doing that in their GPU dept, because it's getting oldhat now.
Also I get that it's gotta be open source for everyone to use (but we've also seen some of their stuff not playing nice in the past with Nvidia cards and vice versa for nvidia tech), but at the same time, it's going to have to contend and beat whatever Nvidia's offering. If I'm sporting a newer nvidia GPU, and AMD's offering isn't going to work as well as what nvidia has, then obv I'm not going to be impressed and opt to choose whatever AMD rolls with, and if more devs decide to roll with AMD's offering, then I'd be screwed as an nvidia owner, which is why I want AMD to not fuck it up and make it better than what nvidia is doing.
Last edited by Chazore - on 17 March 2021Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
