By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ganoncrotch said:
DonFerrari said:

You know that they only said it first because there was backlash and second because a major source of revenue for Google is showing content for which they have no legal rights including streaming.

Just kinda hilarious that the creative director of one of their new projects wasn't aware of the rake he was about to step on with that tweet though, always find it fun when a shit concept attempts to attack things around it in an attempt to make other things seem just as poor as itself... but yeah it just comes off like a outmatched idiot in a fight deciding to go down swinging and ends up punching out his own trainer before landing a punch directly into his own face.

No doubt about it. Someone so disconnected from the company he works at a very high position and openly talks in opposite direction of what that company plan is =p When Nintendo had that action at least it made sense (not that it would work out).

Next we should see this guy saying that Google should pay a big cash for the original content owners.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."