The Ghost of RubangB said:
Sqrl said:
The Ghost of RubangB said:
Yeah I had a professor once who'd been on a couple grand juries and spent half his lectures telling us stories about them.
I think they bent the rules for him because they think the ends justify the means.
Now I'm really interested in the full story. He shot "at least one of them" in the back? It's one or two. That's very vague wording. Where the hell did this plainclothes detective come from and why is he only mentioned in one of the 3 articles? What was he doing while this happened? Would these men really have rushed a man while he's armed with a shotgun pointed at them and there's another man watching on the side?
The more I learn about this, the more it stinks. It's starting to sound more like a cover-up for a wacko 'cuz his wackoness got some baddies off the street, which made everybody happy. |
Well I personally wouldn't rule out the possibility that ABC and the AP writers may have had an anti-gun agenda. There is just as much evidence of that as there is of a coverup.
|
Yeah. That too. I kind of want to believe both now. They should put the wacko in prison for a little bit and fire everybody behind the ABC and AP articles. And track down that mysterious detective who appeared out of thin air to watch it happen and then disappear again.
|
I think thats a solution I can get behind...PUNISH EVERYONE....just to be safe =)
