| Rath said: I don't think anybody should have the right to kill anyone anywhere unless their life (or at least a human life) is in fact at risk. As Sqrl pointed out we don't know the full details of this case but if the men were unarmed then what we have here is a vigilante shooting two unarmed men in the back as they run away - I don't give a flying fuck if they were robbing his neighbour or not, its still not justice in my opinion and I don't believe the law should allow it. |
The neighbors life wasn't at risk when they saw that he caught them.
The owner of the home wouldn't have been in danger if he had been home.
So he should wait until two criminals who are in the middle of a crime pull out there weapons.
A persons property is their life, so they can break in and steal a person's livelihood and he is powerless to stop them.
I certainly wouldn't wait for the government or an insurance company to fix my life. I'd be waiting for a long time.
I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.
