cwbys21 said:
The Ghost of RubangB said:
cwbys21 said:
Rock_on_2008 said:
It has a chance of being a revolutionary step to bring RTS fans to console gaming. Console gaming makes it mainstream so the average Joe can afford to play the game.
StarCraft 2 and Diablo 3 brought to console within 12 months would be a great move and see lots of profits made if they chose to bring console versions of latest PC RTS games. |
they would sell like crap and not be worth the money because console owners expect graphics far about what starcraft and diablo 3 will be offering. I know people will try to be "noble" or some bs and say it isn't about graphics, but the very vast majority of gamers don't feel that way. not to mention starcraft and diablo would both have to be dumbed down to work on consoles, but we have been over the starcraft discussion before and with diablo 3 getting the hot button thing going on for skills I expect the pace to pick up for that and playing it with a controller wouldn't cut it.
edit: sorry to take the thread off topic there. on topic, the game will sell because it says halo on it. most developers will probably realize this and unless they get controls perfect I expect it will change nothing, half assed ports will come along hoping for a quick buck but they will be mediocre at best.
|
The vast majority of gamers bought the Wii, DS, PS2, and PS1, and none of them are known for their superior graphics.
|
diablo 3's and starcraft 2's graphics right now don't even look up to Wii's standards. It would be like taking FFX's graphics and putting it on the Wii, they wouldn't stand up.
|
I was just responding to your comment that the vast majority of gamers care about graphics. They don't. Never have. Never will. Remember the Game Boy's cream 4 shades of spinach colos outselling the Game Gear?
