By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
The_Liquid_Laser said:

1. Third party game sales are more important to Sony/MS than they are to Nintendo.  Reporting first party sales somewhat undercuts the importance of the third party games.

2. In video games, "no news is bad news".  When something sells great, then it gets reported.  When something sells poorly, then you just don't hear anything about it.  Sony actually used to regularly report console shipments just like Nintendo does.  During the PS3 years they stopped doing this, because it stopped being good news.  "Coincidentally" around the same time the NPD stopped reporting software numbers for the top selling games.  Microsoft has always hid most of their sales data, because it has never been good.  Even during the X360 years, their games division was losing a ton of money.  "No news is bad news."

Sony kept reporting PS3 shipment every quarter, are you mixing it with PSVita for some undisclosed reason?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."