Bofferbrauer2 said:
That was a QF, a qualifying Sample, not an ES. So the clock speeds are pretty much final by now. And they have to if they are supposed to ship in Q1 as intended. The i9 11900K can beat the 5800X in Cinebench R20 by 7% in single-core, and even beats it's 8-core predecessor (i7 10700K) by 33% and with similar leads in R23 and CPU-Z sincgle-core tests. But with only a 4.4Ghz Allcore boost and 3.5Ghz base, I doubt it can keep up with Ryzen in anything multicore. Also, the chip drew 160W during it's tests, so not exactly low on power consumption either. But I think the best news come from it's platform: Not only does Intel enter the PCI-E 4.x era with this chip, the B560 will finally allow Memory Overclocking again on non-Z chipsets. |
When I read the news at Videocardz, they labeled the chips as Engineering Samples. Maybe the article is wrong, I don't know. But what I can see is that it makes no sense at all that the 11700 has a much, much higher base clock than the 11900, unless at least one of them is still an ES.
| green_sky said:
|
If only we all had a 3D printer and the skills to use it...
Cool conceot nonetheless, but it will be a dust magnet.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.








Hmm...
Cap'n Yuri the Pirate.