By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mZuzek said:
COKTOE said:

Really? I had no issues with it, and although have become less discriminating over the years, I know that both the PS3 and XB360 versions were well received on their technical merits. Even lauded. A poor comparison. Furthermore, why the shout-out to PS3 specifically when both versions were considered more or less equal? Please state the reasoning behind your post.

Of course I don't know what I'm talking about since I didn't play it on the PS3. But as you say, both versions were more or less equal, I played it on the Xbox 360 and it ran at 20fps pretty much all the time. It was jarring, but it's just how it was back then. But now Cyberpunk running at 20fps is seen as unacceptable despite it being a late gen release like GTA V was.

You know that accepting a bad performance in the past don't obligate you to accept a bad performance now right?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."