ArchangelMadzz said:
Shiken said:
Looks like an XSX win to me overall. Even with slight frame rate advantage on PS5, the higher crowd and traffic density on the XSX is preferable to the world itself IMO. This will vary from person to person I suppose, but performance mode is a noticeable trade off either way. The frame rate on the X is mainly in the mid 50s under stress, which isn't too far from the mark considering you have more going on in crowded areas than PS5.
The XSX is pretty much locked at 30 fps on quality mode, and is the best looking console version to play as well with boosts to ambient occlusion, reflections, lighting, post processing and resolution.
Bugs still present in both however. I look forward to seeing the next gen patch, and will play a second run when it drops. It will be interesting, because this already seems like a gen 9 game forced onto gen 8 consoles. |
I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion.
It runs at a lower resolution, looks worse and dips more at the same 60fps target?
Unless you're arguing the 30fps is a win? |
According to more recent comparisons it runs at a higher resolution on SX, has effects during some sequences like explosions missing on PS5, and most importantly has much more crowd and traffic density on SX. So more NPCs (way more from the videos we have seen), and a higher resolution and it averages 2-3 lower FPS than PS5. I agree with him that the SX version is the superior console version, not even bringing the 30fps quality mode into the equation because 30fps console gaming is beneath me now.
Its irrelevant anyway, this isn’t a real next gen battle it’s a BC battle.
