By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sales2099 said:
DonFerrari said:

Nope you didn't understand the point. Even if all the games from all the studios MS bought were shifted to be exclusive (let's ignore that can't be made) it wouldn't mean MORE games for Xbox as you claim, all those games were already going to Xbox anyway.

MS had 6 years in the gen to build these studios, what they done? On the last year of the gen they bough 15 or so. Please don't insult our intelligence saying they didn't had time to build studios.

Ah I see. Going exclusive means that they would in theory deny Sony. Goes back to my initial statement that being 1st party supersedes any complaints. Being 1st party it makes about as much sense to complain as me complaining why I can’t play Sony 1st party on Xbox. 

They technically started this initiative in 2018. The time before that sure, Xbox scraped by.

Yep. It didn't add to Xbox, but sure can take away from PS, and competitively speaking it have its merit. Was just pointing that if the objective was bringing more games to Xbox them they would need to open new studios instead of buying ones that would already make games to MS.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."