By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sales2099 said:
DonFerrari said:

They could I don't know, open studios. Let's stop pretending MS is a poor company being bullied by evil Sony. But that is the good point about you, you don't pretend, you want MS pooring money to buy marketshare and studios instead of pretending buying whole publishers takes less away than a couple games timed exclusive.

They did. The Initiative and Worlds Edge. Takes too long to make games as you can see and Xbox needs games now. They are doing both, organic and inorganic growth. 

MS isn’t a poor company but Xbox was a poor division (not anymore).

None of the studios MS bought brought any new game to Xbox, all of those were either already making 2nd party games or were 3rd party multiplat devs. Xbox was never a poor division, at most is was a poorly managed one, sure you can also say it wasn't a profitable one as well.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."