By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sales2099 said:
DonFerrari said:

Sure, almost same thing to buy a developer that for the past 20 years or so mostly developed exclusives that Sony own all the IPs and buying a major publisher because certainly Zenimax couldn't fund their games. You talk so much about poking the bear one one hand, you wouldn't have an issue if Sony bought S-E, Capcom, etc right?

Xbox is trying to catch up on years of neglect and get back lost marketshare. This makes their acquisitions necessary for proper competition. 

Sony buying more studios is just them widening their lead and retaining their stranglehold on non-Nintendo gaming. Not exactly the same thing. 

They could I don't know, open studios. Let's stop pretending MS is a poor company being bullied by evil Sony. But that is the good point about you, you don't pretend, you want MS pooring money to buy marketshare and studios instead of pretending buying whole publishers takes less away than a couple games timed exclusive.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."