By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation said:
DonFerrari said:

Guess for all the attacks that English isn't my first language you failed in reading, some PS4 exclusives ported to PC and even Xbox/Switch. Means the focal was on some to PC (Horizon for example, allowing Detroit and Death Stranding is another) and even Xbox/Switch is the addition which is MLB.

You can ask me and I'll say I'm a Sony fan without holding the pretenses you and Ludicrous hold of being neutral and impartial.

Don, i am not trying to attack you, i am just stating that the comparison between the two is way different, even with a few games crossing over isn't on the same level as Xbox. This isn't about picking sides, its just stating reality. Xbox share majority of there games on PC and some even on Switch and PS. You cant compare the two, Sony rarely do that, and when they do, its very little. Anything is better than nothing so props for Sony for at least giving something. 

It goes back to the Tomb Raider debate, Everyone loves calling out Xbox for making deals, but we all seem to forget the very same prince-able applied when Tomb Raider came into existence and no one bats an eye. Its better to be fair than how people pick sides and think its okay when one does it but not the other. Sony, Nintendo and Xbox are all guilty for the same things but seeing one company buy a Timed exclusive deal and think its okay because it suits their console preference and yet when another does something similar which doesn't support their console preference it becomes a major problem and is called out for it. 

These are the things i pick up on. Its not an attack but a FYI.

I wasn't comparing then, and even said that it was some occurences of multiplat from Sony teams, etc. You disputed as if you didn't understood the point.

If no one bated an eye you and Ludicrous wouldn't be bringing this here. Also can bring RE and many other examples of 3 decades ago to justify what MS is doing now, but then you can't in other discussions pretend that what MS done in the start of the gen is irrelevant because only matters what happens now.

Regarding the topic in point, 2 years is really a lot and can be harming to xbox fans, but being a new IP that we don't know how quality it will be and how much Sony is involved in the production it alleviates a little the issue. But no we can't say MS outright buying 15 studios is less problematic than Sony securing one or 5 timed exclusives because MS release games on PC and may release some of those on PS.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."