By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Captain_Yuri said:

So from what I can tell.

1080p
6900XT > 3090 in Raster

1440p
6900XT > 3090 in Raster

4k
3090 > 6900XT in Raster. Closer to a 3080

Potato Ray Tracing
Super Potato when you enable DLSS

Still, AMD taking the people crown at any resolution is quite an achievement.

I think that anyone buying either the 3090 or the 6900XT will already have a 4K monitor, so for them the 3090 is the better deal and, unlike with the other cards, has more memory. And the extra $500 won't be a deal breaker.

But it could be a good card for those that want to play at 1440p and have a 144Hz monitor.

By the way, here's the usual review roundup from Videocardz: https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-radeon-rx-6900-xt-review-roundup

Also, looks like part of the supply problems of the 3070, 3060Ti and all AMD cards could be the lack of enough GDDR6 chips: https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/poor-availability-of-rx-6800-(xt)-and-rtx-3060-ti-and-3070-would-be-due-shortage-of-gddr6-chips.html



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.