By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:

I wouldn't be using Ubi games as the basis of what Current gen can do against the likes of the 20 series, let alone the 30 series. I think Ubi is the second to last publisher for gaming benchmarks we should be looking at, with bethesda being last.

We're better off waiting for titles like Minecraft, with full on RT or Cyberpunk. I know both of those are Nvidia sponsored, but let's be frank, most of the time we get AMD sponsored games, Nvidia sinks, and atm we're 2 consoles with AMD as well as AMD's GPU's vs nvidia's current set of GPU's and some previous gen ones.

Besides, I'm more interested in seeing how MC bedrock RTX performs over a 3 layer DRM, console parity forced game like Creed or Watch Dogs.

How would we accurately judge the power of the consoles if we have to only use games that are optimized to hell for them? Seems like an unfair comparison to me. Ubisoft games are much better because then the GPU has to bruteforce performance and we'll see the true strength. Otherwise we'll only judge the performance of game developers rather than the performance of hardware.

And in the end that's what performance is. PC people go ham over the strongest possible hardware exactly so we can be sure that even the most unoptimized garbage can run decently. That's the beauty of PC gaming. We don't have to complain to devs to make games better, we just buy better hardware to compensate.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.