By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 26 November 2020
Edit Thread
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

I would say this would be more of a case that would go if you can't prove it doesn't belong to Sony then we can keep assuming it belongs.

It is quite possible that Sony even received money from the sales on smartphone. And on the help I think it was SSM that almost co-developed, done the same with couple other devs as well right?

That's why I'd always ask for someone to acquire said contract that shows us who owns what specifically, and since no one here has said access, we're left to go with the overwhelming evidence of Sony's aid, both financially and team based.

I'm not sure who pubbed the game on phones though, but I imagine Sony would have made something out of that. 

I don't think Sony would need to publish it on phones to make a cut, there is probably some royalty fee somewhere no matter where is released or who releases.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."