By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Cerebralbore101 on 23 November 2020
Edit Thread
LudicrousSpeed said:
Cerebralbore101 said:

1. A complete experience is to experience something in it's entirety including every part.

2. Changing your multiplayer skin is a part of Gears 5.

3. Therefore in order to get the complete Gears 5 experience you need to have access to all the multiplayer skins.

It's a straightforward deductive argument.

How about you work on trying to refute my last argument having to do with your ridiculous Ellie Edition comparison? I suspect you brought up this new angle of attack, because you know that you can't win that one. ;)

No, accessing every single skin isn’t required for the complete experience. What a nonsensical position to take. You get tons of cosmetics included in Gears 5 and unlock even more. There are extras if you want to unlock them. They aren’t required for the complete experience. If there were characters or abilities or levels locked behind a paywall, ok, you might be missing out on the “complete experience”, but this is nothing but optional extra skins they make. You should have taken a little longer to come up with something better.

Regarding the Ellie Edition argument, I don’t need to refute anything because you’re doing it for me. I understand it’s a weak argument to make, I know that because it’s the same argument you’re making for any game with cosmetic unlocks. So you’re just arguing against your own nonsense :)

Yeah, it's as I thought. You don't actually understand logic. Your options are to either refute premise 1, or premise 2. Instead, you just wind up restating your weak claims, and try to back them up with Inductive arguments. Deductive arguments beat Inductive arguments everytime, so you lose the debate.


If you think my Ellie edition arguments are contradictory, then please point out the contradictions. But I suppose you don't actually understand what a logical contradiction is either. So you have some required reading... https://www.csus.edu/indiv/m/mayesgr/phl4/handouts/phl4contradiction.htm

But I know I'm wasting my time with you. You're not interested in having a logical discussion, and don't know even the basics of logic. Instead you attempt to use your own subjective intuition as a rule of what's logical and what's not logical. And since you refuse to accept objective logical standards, preferring your own subjective standards, you always win in your own head. This is why, instead of attempting to actually argue, you simply trumpet your imaginary victory, while restating your already refuted claims.