green_sky said:
Thanks. You know these threads go, hard to find anything. Two or three people arguing with quote trees. OT: I think skins mt's are okay ish. Anything that effects gameplay is not nice or gives unfair advantage to others. Like getting some drops in COD games loot boxes. In single player titles, bloat is a big issue or i guess just game design now. So some people rather pay to play those games rather than just ignore them like i do. Tons to play these days, ignore the boring bloat games. |
Don't worry, totally understand you.
LudicrousSpeed said:
What personal attack are you referring to? "you said something stupid"? That's not a personal attack, that's an attack on his argument. And no, I won't be going into any thread to "defend Sony" because I don't post in Sony threads anymore, too much spamming :) But the fact that you think I am defending MS in this thread just goes to show how stupid console warz mentality is.
Please, take the day. Hell, take a week. It will take you that long to be able to come up with something that explains how optional multiplayer skins are required for the "complete experience" in Gears 5. We'll all be here waiting. You can work on your Last of Us 2 $249 thread in the meantime, friend.
Maybe you only spent $80. Sorry, not enough for the complete experience. Also, don't play for too many hours, that's also bad. |
If you don't think you have been dissing personal attacks that talk volumes on how you only see others as console warriors but not yourself.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







