Mummelmann said:
Yeah, if there is indeed a 3080Ti coming in only a couple of months, this is bound to be close to a 3090 in performance, but it needs to be priced to compete with a 6900. Seeing as how it'll have more and arguably better features and probably vastly improved RT capabilities compared to 6900 (which is no small part of why one would shell out that much for a GPU right now), AMD is a no-go for me. Seeing them launch without a DLSS alternative, downplaying its relevance, while they're simultaneously actually working on one shows us that AMD isn't as prepared and steeled as we might think. Their very own products appear to have been a bit hasty (especially since the driver issues seemed to be pretty bad right now), probably just as much so as Nvidia's frantic avalanche of new cards they can't really deliver. |
There is no possible way to alienate either 3080 or 3090 buyers. A XX80ti that's 10% better and even more expensive is par for the course. And no 3090 buyer would even want a 3080ti. People who buy a 3090 do not regard $500 as a price gap.
Trumpstyle said: RDNA2 just doesn't look that good, it's not living up to its hype. Price/perf is the same or worse as AMPERE, Perf/W looks about the same except on techpowerup, there RDNA2 is much more efficient most likely a screwup from them. |
Pretty sure there was only a single person here who was hyping up RDNA2.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.