jardesonbarbosa said:
Maybe it's not something to celebrate, but if they are paying for the whole studio/publisher talent, technology and opperation they can do whatever they want. Just like Nintendo paying for Bayonetta was ok, because they took the risk for themselves, so they deserve the rewards. However, coming around when the game is almost finished to pay some money with the only intent to prevent some people people from playing the game is some evil shit. I'm sorry, but it's not even comparable. |
Ok, so for you to lose access for some months in a couple of games is worse than forever for several dozen, ok. Makes zero sense, but you are entitled to your opinion.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







