| JWeinCom said: THREAD WARNING O_o... dafuq happened here? I don't know if there is a proper place for making lists of users by console allegiance (I'd say probably no), but if there is, it certainly isn't in this thread about the PS4-PS5 transition taking 3 years. I don't *think* I see anything here that requires action, but definitely not heading in a good direction. So, if you guys want to talk about the PS4-PS5 transition taking 3 years, get back on track. Continuing on this path is probably going to lead to either thread bans, ban bans, or a lock as might be necessary. I get that it takes away from the excitement of next gen, but I think it's also important to show people that investing in your machine will pay off in the long run. I was willing to buy an XBox One this year because I was confident it would've been wasted money (although I regret it), and likewise last gen I bought a PS3 in like 2011 because of how well Sony supported the PS2. |
As long as there is a healthy number of next-gen exclusives from the platform holder there isn't a problem with 3rd parties and some less demanding 1st party games being crossgen. But if you don't give enough reason to buy the new console that is bad.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







