chakkra said:
Well, my intention was not to complain about Sony not clarifying anything. I really don't care about what Sony says since that doesn't directly affect me, but in order to call Hynad out I had to mention Sony, I'm sorry. But since you seem so against the idea of anyone mentioning Sony, I'm actually now feeling the desire to post a piece of the interview that started this whole thing: One way to keep PS4 users engaged would be to make upcoming PS5 games playable on the older machine, just like Microsoft is proposing with its Xbox Series X games being playable on Xbox One. Yet Ryan says that's not something PlayStation is interested in doing. "We have always said that we believe in generations. We believe that when you go to all the trouble of creating a next-gen console, that it should include features and benefits that the previous generation does not include. And that, in our view, people should make games that can make the most of those features. "We do believe in generations, and whether it's the DualSense controller, whether it's the 3D audio, whether it's the multiple ways that the SSD can be used... we are thinking that it is time to give the PlayStation community something new, something different, that can really only be enjoyed on PS5." |
I guess we already discussed this last week and how he didn't say anything about not having crossgen games or anything, just that he believes in generation and making games that make use of PS5, guess what Sackboy, SM:MM even though crossgen makes very good use of PS5. With SM being the best use of RT so far and sackboy using several features of the controler and the cards+video tips. Then you have Astro's Playroom and Demon's Souls which can only be enjoyed on PS5. So yes he didn't lie nor imply anything. Every miss interpretation was done in intent by other people. Which is very different of MS explicitly saying they don't want to force people to move to new gen and that all their games would be crossgen for the next 2 years (which they well we already have some that will be Series only) and after that saying X1 wouldn't hold the Series version, when well for all purposes it seems it did as no game is pushing Series (is there any game on Series that looks better than Demon's Souls or SM:MM?). So it is quite clear why one is met with more criticism than the other by general public.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







