Bofferbrauer2 said:
Considering you have to basically divide the number of cuda cores in half with Ampere compared to Turing, the 3050 seems kinda weak compared to the 1650 SUPER. Alo, 90W TGP for that is disappointing since the base 1650 had only 75W and thus didn't need any power connectors and could be fed entirely through the PCI-E slot. I predict only a ~5% performance increase over the 1650 Super with that data. |
Yeah, performance won't be much better than the older models, and the extra power cunsumption will go, mostly, to power the ray tracing hardware, because this time all cards should get it, hence why it's an RTX 3050 part, and not GTX.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.







