shikamaru317 said:
It most likely can handle 1080p 60 fps, but Ubisoft figured that the target audience for Series S, casuals, would prefer higher resolution over higher framerate. And honestly, they might be right. But I definitely think that Series S is capable of 1080p 60 fps on AC Valhalla, another Ubisoft game from this Holiday, Watch Dogs Legion, has dynamic resolution scaling from 720p-1080p on Series S and from 1440p-2160p on Series X, with raytracing on both. The gap in performance between Watch Dogs on S and X suggests that AC Valhalla should be capable of 1080p 60 fps on Series S since Series X is 2160p 60 fps, but Ubisoft decided that the target audience of Series S would rather have 1440p 30 fps than 1080p 60 fps. It's a shame that Ubisoft isn't a fan of multiple performance profiles, would be nice if they allowed people to choose between framerate and resolution modes on Series S. |
If they had made it 1440p30fps then sure we could say they gave preference for res, but when they gone 1080p30fps versus 4k60fps of Series X then for me they were just being odd in choice. But you are right most won't care that it is 30fps, I don't.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







