By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sales2099 said:
DonFerrari said:
sales2099 said:
Drakrami said:
lol at microsoft trying to hit that 300 price point to grab market share with total disregard for the customer/gamer. It's like Trump trying to win the presidency.

Total disregard is a bit dramatic don’t you think? It’s a very capable console, leaps better then the original Xbox One and even Xbox X. A $300 console with a SSD is a deal. You assume the people playing this console have an eye for this stuff like we do (they don’t). It’s a affordable next gen console with an SSD, and essentially a cheap Game Pass console if you want most bang for buck. 

Sorry but I can't agree that at the time of release X1 wasn't a subpar console compared to PS or PCs, Series S is a subpar console in hindsight.

Meh, if Nintendo can get away with weak hardware I think for what Series S can do for $300 I’d say it’s great for what you paying for. 

Nintendo isn't directly competing and has portability in its favor.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."