PIMP said:
mrstickball said:
Jandre002 said:
Ok I wasn't asking if it copied it or not. It clearly has the same features as XBL. Now if you are talking about downloading movies/music, I would rather just do that on iTunes anyways. As far as downloading Qore, that still works out to much less than live a year. You still get demos on PSN store anyways, and really the only features that PSN doesn't have (yet) are game invites and in-game voice chat.
For you who don't know, this Wednesday PS3 will have:
In-game Messaging
In-game music
In-game everthing basically that Live has except for voice messages(?) and game invites.
Are those two features really worth $50 im saying. I thought the answer was clearly no and we would all agree that Microsoft needs to do something lol. Guess not?
|
Anyone want to do a comparison on how much content there is available on PSN versus XBL, for game demos, trailers and games to see exactly how much bigger the 360's is, before we say the features are the same?
I mean, a Kia has the same features (AC, Power Windows, ABS) as a Lexus....Right?
|
I totally agree with mrstickball.
*Checks VG chartz and sees Soul Caliber released for XBLA only and laughs at PS3 owners*
|
*Checks long list of XBL games to see if any measure up to Warhawk or Socom:Confrontation.*
Yeah about that lol. You get Ms.Pacman and that warrants charging $50 a year for online service? Ha well if getting a demo fills you with happiness maybe you and Mr.Stickball enjoy being charged that much just to be able to play games online. For everyone else who would rather get to play the game online for free over paying $50 to get and play a demo, umm theres PSN.
Lol. Come on. Thats a pretty desperate attempt. Is XBL better in some ways.YES IT IS. Is it worth $50 a year? No its not. Thats what im getting at. But I guess some people are in denial that PSN will be on the same level as XBL to most people in the world.
