By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sales2099 said:
DonFerrari said:

Funny thing, I could swear from the several threads that the promise was same fps because the CPU was the same and all the cuts would be on graphical aspects.

Huh, then that’s silly optimism on my people’s behalf. It’s a lofty promise for FPS to remain consistent with Series X for the next 7 years. In general the message seemed to be “same games, everything scaled down”. Much like PC games with Ultra and Medium settings. 

Same CPU, weaker GPU. Most we have seem on VGC was people expecting Series S to have same framerate but 1/4 the resolution. Let's say you want crossplay, would Series S having 30fps versus Series X or PS5 in 60fps wouldn't do well.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."