Barkley said: Errr.... "KEEP IT ALL ON XBOX, MICROSOFT! I DO NOT WANT TO SEE THESE GAMES ON PLAYSTATION! FORCE ME to buy your console" Why would you want to be forced to buy more hardware to play games on rather than play them on hardware you already have. The ideal scenario for consumers is all games on every system. Choose the one you want, get everything. No need to shell out money on hardware you don't need. |
LudicrousSpeed said:
Reminds me of when EA Access was going to be terrible because EA would lock full games behind it and jack the price up and then every other publisher would follow suit. Within years we’ll have to subscribe to eleven different services for a total of hundreds a month just to be able to play games! Of course, none of that happened. If GamePass becomes as big a success as you’re worried about, it will be because MS offers a value that people won’t be able to resist. This is bad for consumers? And why would an optional subscription service become the only relevant gaming option? You can still buy all GamePass games outside of the service. Most games still aren’t on GamePass and a lot of the bigger titles that come from third party, come months after launch. Just seems like a whole lot of worry for no good reason. |
If Gamepass ever becomes what they are describing customers will leave the service in a mass exodus and Microsoft will have to change their ways. The goal for Microsoft is to retain and grow the service therefore the fear-mongering happening isn't really the reality of what should happen. Unless Microsoft really grows the service to have a complete monopoly but with competition from Google and Amazon on the subscription front and combine with whatever Nintendo and Sony are offering in the gaming space that is not likely to ever happen.