By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bandorr said:
sales2099 said:

Fair enough. I didn’t want to call out people that had nothing to do with this conversation but I see your point. Individuals and objective thinkers aside that seemed to be the pack mentality. 

For GP comment, both are subs end of day. GP is just $10/month and gets you so much more.  

Otherwise what you say has merit but between Game Pass and Backwards compatibility, the argument of older games bolstering the new generation goes to Xbox hands down. This collection is a nice touch and full of value in itself. Not denying that. 

PS live is the equivalent of Xbox live. Not game pass. You and ludicrous need to stop pushing this. It's a poor argument made just to push the "gets you so much more.".

PS Collection is a combination with PS+. So $60. So around $5 a month.

To make the comparison you need to combine Xbox live and Gamepass. So $15 a month. Every month. 12 months a year. so $180.

The PS+ games are "permanent" as soon as you redeem them. The game pass games rotate you never full own them (without buying them).

It cost three times as much. It's a separate service.  It offers far more games and includes games day one.

You are picking up a pile of newspapers and comparing them against a blanket "they keep you warm AND you can read them". It's a poor comparison.

Technically it’s $10 if you don’t play multiplayer. A subs a sub. And saying just because the $5 per month is less money then a $10 per month doesn’t make it the better value for games. Both quality and quantity. Again, nevermind the night and day BC. FYI Game Pass is the blanket and PS Plus is the newspaper. Blankets are more expensive but keep you much warmer. You absolutely right, it is a poor comparison. 



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles.