EricHiggin said:
It's a new gen with new consoles. XB1X wasn't upgraded to XBSS. It's a new console, even though it's basically taking the place of the XB1X. Even if you wanted to look at it like it was a more direct upgrade, think of where the XB1X should be priced this holiday based on it's past pricing, and look at it's specs vs XBSS. You're already getting a much more valuable console as it is. How much more does MS have to add in? |
You get it backward.
I`m not saying XBSS is replacing X1X, but it is more capable than it so getting the same version of X1S isn`t cutting it. It really does seem like the console was totally capable of doing it but they decided to not. Guess it will be one of those cases where "you can't simply turn a flip"
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
