By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Runa216 said:
Xxain said:

What? Its not SONY's job to inform the public on games coming to other products. You'd be a terrible sales agent. 

True, but I like how relatively forthright they are. Xbox always does everything it can to make it sound like games are Xbox Exclusives, and they're not. that's what upset people about Microsoft's strategy. That's why people keep poking fun at what they do but not Sony. 

I didn't even know Final Fantasy VII Remake was a timed exclusive. I literally tried looking up a copy on Xbox One for a friend of mine because I didn't realize it had any exclusivity at all. To be fair, that was just ignorance on my part, but it shows how different the companies are. one HAS exclusives and confidence in said exclusives so they don't have to shove it down your throat. The other lacks exclusives and thus needs to twist the definition and trick people into believing things that aren't fully true. It reeks of desperation. 

I don't even know if I'm arguing with you or supporting you, to be honest. I just thought this was a good time to say what I felt about the situation.

If you look at the PS5 reveal you`ll see that every third party title announced either wouldn`t say it have any exclusivity (so it is multiplat) or say First on PS5 or Console Launch exlcusivity or equivalent to temporary exclusivity or would say console exclusive if it would be permanent (like SF V).



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."