kazuyamishima said:
Good to know is still receiving excellent scores. And 93/100 seems to be the final score of this game. Really nice one. |
Perhaps they looked to MC to decide the score =p
0D0 said:
I had played the first one this year. I might replay it many times in the future. A true classic. --- To those who say the second one is superior in every single thing, one has to remember that part 2 is a PS4 game and the first was a PS3 game. Given the technology the first one was the best game ever made. We need to compare both with some context. Remove the technology you get the story. If story stinks, you shoot the game.
Hate didn't influenced my dislike of the game, so I give the benefit of the doubt to both the reviewers who gave 100 and the ones who gave 70. I think it's fair. |
So many in VGC hopes that technology would still be the same of gen 5 =p
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."