| Chazore said: As Yuri says, DLSS is the gift that keeps on giving. I honestly don't know how the hell AMD is supposed to wallop Nvidia with similar tech, when Nvidia has been building up to this. |
True. DLSS is amazing for PC gamers. Enabling even mid-tier card buyers to enjoy high resolution gaming and crazy high FPS for higher tier users and offer considerably better VR experience. And now 8K gaming.. which I thought wouldn't happen until at least another generation.
Nvidia has no equal in ML so long as they have their huge budget in R&D in AI and their tensor cores. AMD needs to have a similar hardware solution to compete. And before anyone says DirectML is the answer. Nope.
| Captain_Yuri said: Dynamic resolution support is huge. Like hot damn huge. It could mean that games that support DLSS 2.1 can not only play games at high resolution while having a low internal resolution but also have a consistent framerate as well. Not to mention on the sections where the GPU has more headroom, the games could also look better. Now because of how low of an internal resolution DLSS already works with, that ain't a problem but as we head on to the next generation, Turing will start to show it's age and this is what will keep the Turing and potato Ampere owners afloat... If they haven't sold their 2000 series already loll. |
Yeah, this is huge. I'd imagine this being a massive plus for any of the crazy folk playing on like 5-8K screens. While also giving people on 4K or even 1440P an amazing smooth experience. This is a very smart way of balancing performance and while still giving you good image quality.
But Idd.. I'd also hate to be the guy who recently bought a 2080Ti xD
